Search for a command to run...
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Share
Share this article
In this non-technical post, I talk about why red teaming doesn't have to turn you into the villain, discussed various non-technical aspects of responsible red teaming.
Let me speak plainly, as one speaks to oneself in the quiet hours before dawn. There exists a pattern in mankind's history, a pattern so consistent, so predictable, that to ignore it would be an act of supreme negligence.
These thoughts have circled in my mind for months, unspoken until now. I set them down here. Should you find error in them, or hold a different view, feel free to point it out :)
Every great civilization that has risen to prominence, every society that has touched the heights of human achievement, has followed the same road to its dissolution. Not through wars, famine, or plague, though these played their parts. But through something far more insidious, the slow decay of critical thinking, replaced by the worship of ignorance and the celebration of stupidity.
We are not merely observing this phenomenon. We are participants in its highest stage.
I watched a film named Blade Runner 2049, Starring Ryan Gosling and Ana de Armas, released in 2017. It painted a world where humanity had achieved technological godhood yet lost its soul, where artificial beings possessed more humanity than their creators, memory itself could be manufactured and sold. When I reflect upon our present moment, the parallels are not merely striking but they are kind of roadmap we follow with disturbing precision. We live in an age where we can create artificial intelligence but cannot maintain our own critical faculties, we engineer digital memories through carefully curated social media feeds while forgetting how to think independently. Reality television personalities ascend to positions of supreme power. Scientists, monks who dedicated their lives to understanding our world and guiding us to the path of dharma and beyond what we can see with human eyes, are dismissed and disrespected as elitists for suggesting we might cease poisoning our very own planet.
But here is what should truly chill the blood in your veins, this pattern is ancient. It happened before us, to our ancestors. From the grandeur of Rome to the astronomical precision of Indian civilization, from the philosophical heights of ancient China to the Islamic Golden Age that preserved the knowledge of mankind while Europe burned its books, most advanced societies have walked this same path to destruction. They all reached that critical juncture where wisdom became unfashionable, expertise aroused suspicion, and immediate gratification eclipsed long-term survival.
The Roman Empire, at its peak, possessed the most sophisticated engineering, the most refined legal systems, the most formidable military organization the world had known. Ancient India developed the concept of zero, pioneered advanced and structured ways of living, and calculated astronomical phenomena with extraordinary precision. The Islamic Golden Age gave us algebra, advanced medicine, and safeguarded the works of Aristotle and other great thinkers for future generations. These were technological and intellectual powerhouses that somehow, inexplicably, lost their way.
In 2016, Oxford Dictionaries named "post-truth" their word of the year, acknowledging a fundamental shift in human discourse, objective facts had become less influential than appeals to emotion and personal belief. Research reveals that false information spreads six times faster than truth on social media platforms. We are not approaching the precipice of idiocracy, we are sprinting toward it, smartphones in hand, live-streaming and posting our own intellectual demise.
And now, we stand at the threshold of an even more profound transformation. Artificial intelligence that can write, reason, and create has emerged as a present reality. We have developed machines capable of generating art, composing music, writing code, and even mimicking human conversation with startling sophistication. Yet here is the paradox that should give us pause, we are creating artificial intelligence at the precise moment we are abandoning natural intelligence. We build systems to think for us while systematically dismantling our own capacity for critical thought.
The evidence surrounds us, if we possess the courage to see it clearly. Anti-vaccination movements have resurrected diseases we had nearly eradicated from human experience. Climate change denial persists despite overwhelming scientific consensus, the vast majority of climate scientists agree on human-caused warming, yet public opinion remains fractured. Conspiracy theories proliferate faster than verified information because they offer something truth cannot, what we call, my friends, emotional satisfaction without intellectual effort.
Consider the technological marvel of large language models trained on the entirety of human knowledge accessible through the internet. These systems can answer questions, solve problems, and engage in sophisticated reasoning. Yet increasingly, people use these tools not to enhance their understanding, but to replace it entirely. Students employ AI to write their works without even reading or understanding them, to solve their problems without comprehending them, to think their thoughts without examining them. We have created the ultimate shortcut around intellectual effort, and we are taking it with enthusiasm.
We have reached a peculiar juncture in human civilization where expertise itself is viewed with suspicion, where "doing your own research" means watching Instagram reel videos rather than engaging with peer-reviewed studies or simply sitting and thinking, where people trust AI generated content without questioning its sources or accuracy. The tools that could elevate human understanding instead become crutches that atrophy our intellectual muscles.
So let me ask you directly, as I would ask myself, When was the last time you changed your mind about something of consequence? When did you last actively seek information that challenged your deepest convictions and pushed you out of your comfort zone?
The decay of civilization always begins identically, the systematic erosion of critical thinking. It starts subtly, like a hairline fracture in a wall that eventually brings down the entire structure. Centuries ago, Socrates understood this danger with clarity. He declared that "the unexamined life is not worth living." Athens responded by forcing him to drink hemlock. What was his crime? The audacity to ask uncomfortable questions, to challenge intellectual complacency. For this, he was executed.
The parallel to our present age is terrifying. We no longer require poison to silence critical thinkers, we have developed something far more effective, social media algorithms engineered to feed us precisely what we wish to hear. Many people on social media share false information rather than accurate news, particularly when it confirms their existing beliefs. And above social media algorithms, the firms who control the data.
But there is something even more insidious at work. We now have deepfake technology (or is it a curse?), capable of creating video and audio recordings of people saying things they never said, doing things they never did. AI generated images flood our social media feeds, indistinguishable from reality to the untrained eye. We live in an age where seeing is no longer believing, the very evidence of our senses can be fabricated with algorithmic precision. Yet rather than responding to this crisis by sharpening our critical faculties, we are dulling them further, outsourcing our judgment to the very technologies that make deception easier than ever before.
Our problem extends beyond just formal education. Observe how we consume information in this age. We have programmed ourselves to react to headlines rather than engage with content. Our attention spans have contracted to the point where complex ideas cannot compete with simple slogans and emotional triggers.
Here, civilizations lose their capacity to think beyond immediate gratification. "Me, now" becomes more important than "us, later." Yes, I am too a narcissist when it comes to certain things, we all are.
Friedrich Nietzsche offered a sharp analysis. He wrote of "the last men", people who would become so obsessed with comfort and security that they would lose all capacity for greatness, for sacrifice, for thinking beyond their own lifespans.
Ancient India provides another instructive example. Sanatan civilization produced extraordinary mathematicians, astronomers who theorized about atomic particles (paramanu), and philosophers. They constructed temples with architectural precision that still astounds engineers today and developed sophisticated systems of medicine in Ayurveda. We gave the world the decimal system, concepts of infinity, non-duality, and astronomical calculations that mapped celestial movements with remarkable accuracy. But when our society began to fracture under internal divisions and external pressures, we faced a crucial choice: unity and long-term sustainability, or fragmentation and immediate power struggles. We lost to external powers due to our ignorance.
The choice toward fragmentation won. Despite possessing the mathematical sophistication to understand planetary motions and the philosophical depth of the Upanishads, the very original form of this great civilization gradually lost its capacity for collective action. We had the wisdom to conceptualize the cosmic cycles of creation and destruction, yet we could not apply that same long-term thinking to our social and political structures. Although Sanatan is still alive and always will.
Modern technology has weaponized this bias. Social media platforms, gaming applications, streaming services, all designed with sophisticated AI algorithms that exploit our psychological vulnerabilities, Companies nowadays adding AI to everything. every content recommendation precisely calibrated to trigger our reward circuits. We carry devices in our pockets that have been engineered, using billions of dollars of research and development, to make us think short-term, to keep us scrolling, to ensure we never pause long enough to consider the long-term consequences of our digital lives.
Consider the 2008 financial crisis. As from my limited understanding of this event, Wall Street executives knew that subprime mortgages were fundamentally unsustainable. But because short-term profits were enormous, they continued selling these products and lobbied against regulations that would have prevented the crisis. When collapse came, millions lost their homes and savings, while the some executives received taxpayer funded bailouts.
This is short-term narcissism at a civilizational level, privatizing profits while socializing long-term costs. We have created systems that reward immediate gratification and punish long-term wisdom at every level of society.
The psychological patterns that destroy civilizations begin with individual choices that seem harmless in isolation but become catastrophic when multiplied across millions of people.
Here is where the pattern becomes truly dangerous. It forms an interconnected spiral where intellectual decay, short-term thinking, and anti-expertise sentiment feed off each other, creating what people call a "doom loop."
When critical thinking erodes, people become more susceptible to short-term thinking because they cannot process complex long-term consequences. When short-term thinking dominates, people usually lose patience for the careful work that real expertise requires. When expertise is rejected, decision-making deteriorates, creating more problems and making people more desperate for simple solutions.
Climate change represents the ultimate test of whether our civilization can break this cycle. It requires all three things our society is losing: critical thinking about complex systems, long-term planning beyond immediate comfort, and trust in scientific expertise.
And now we have artificial intelligence systems that consume enormous amounts of energy, contributing to the very climate crisis they might help us solve. Data centers running AI models require power equivalent to entire cities. The carbon footprint of training a single large language model can equal the lifetime emissions of five automobiles. We are using advanced technology to accelerate our understanding of planetary systems while simultaneously accelerating planetary warming. The contradiction is almost poetic in its tragedy.
I think we stand at the same crossroads every great civilization has faced. We can follow Rome into comfortable fragmentation until reality forces a harsh awakening. Or we can choose the harder path of renewal, consciously rebuilding our capacity for wisdom.
Our role in renewal starts with honest self-assessment. How often do you choose easy answers over right answers? When did you last change your mind based on evidence rather than emotion?
History does not repeat, but it rhymes. The pattern of civilizational decay is as ancient as civilization itself. But so is the pattern of renewal of societies that choose wisdom over comfort, knowledge over ignorance, long-term thinking over immediate gratification.
The question is not whether we can avoid the fate of Rome or any other once great civilization. The question is whether we will choose to if we will be remembered as the generation that broke the cycle or completed it.
The conversation about tomorrow starts today, and it starts with me and you.
Thank you for reading so far!